WEBVTT
00:00:00.161 --> 00:00:09.227
What do you do if you're being asked to intervene with behavior or write behavior intervention plans, as we've been talking about in our last few episodes?
00:00:09.227 --> 00:00:12.272
But you just don't feel good about it.
00:00:12.272 --> 00:00:17.132
And it's not because you don't feel like you know enough or you know how to handle behavior.
00:00:17.132 --> 00:00:22.571
It just feels fundamentally wrong to your school counseling position.
00:00:22.571 --> 00:00:34.609
If you've been listening to my last few episodes on behavior intervention plans, you've probably walked away with a lot to think about and maybe you did feel uncomfortable.
00:00:34.609 --> 00:00:50.709
Maybe these thoughts about behaviorism don't sit right with you, and that would not be surprising because for many school counselors, traditional behavior approaches feel misaligned with how we're trained to understand students.
00:00:50.709 --> 00:01:02.865
You're probably feeling the tension between a system that wants charts and consequences and compliance and your instincts that are telling you to slow down and connect.
00:01:02.865 --> 00:01:15.447
You might have even found yourself wondering how you support students without participating in practices that feel more like we're trying to be in control and less like we care.
00:01:15.447 --> 00:01:19.329
If that's you, I want you to hear this.
00:01:19.329 --> 00:01:21.647
You are not looking at this wrong.
00:01:21.647 --> 00:01:29.206
These conversations are complicated and as school counselors, we are often caught right smack dab in the middle.
00:01:29.206 --> 00:01:47.134
In this episode of the podcast, we're going to talk about that tension, the tension between behaviorism and trauma-informed care, because, whether we realize it or not, we're using elements of both of them every single day.
00:01:47.134 --> 00:01:50.108
Hey, my friend, welcome back.
00:01:50.108 --> 00:01:55.492
I'm so glad you're here with me for another episode of the School for School Counselors podcast.
00:01:55.492 --> 00:02:12.913
I'm Steph Johnson, a full-time school counselor, just like you, on a mission to make school counseling feel more sustainable and more enjoyable, and this is the last in a series of podcast episodes revolving around behavior intervention.
00:02:12.913 --> 00:02:42.306
Now, traditionally this shouldn't be considered a primary role for us as school counselors, but unfortunately we are often tagged as the default right and we are called to go intervene in explosive behaviors, to figure out behavior plans and what steps come next, as well as sometimes trying to assure that everyone is compliant, and that's a big load on our shoulders, especially when we never really were trained to do that kind of work.
00:02:42.306 --> 00:02:52.432
And then that tension comes in between our counseling expertise and these behaviorism lenses that don't quite feel like they match up very well.
00:02:52.432 --> 00:02:55.947
So let's start with the basics there.
00:02:55.947 --> 00:03:02.704
In the last episode, I talked in detail about how behavior intervention plans are built.
00:03:02.704 --> 00:03:12.128
We started with observations, we moved through functional behavior assessments and then we finally ended up in data-driven goals and interventions.
00:03:12.128 --> 00:03:32.509
That entire process is rooted in behaviorism and while behavior plans absolutely have value on our campuses, especially when we build them well, they're also rooted in a system of thinking that can feel foreign and even uncomfortable to us.
00:03:32.509 --> 00:03:37.211
If you didn't catch that last episode, you should go back and give it a listen.
00:03:37.211 --> 00:03:40.622
It'll help give a little bit more context to today's conversation.
00:03:42.264 --> 00:03:49.081
Behaviorism is fundamentally the idea that behavior is observable, measurable and changeable.
00:03:49.081 --> 00:03:59.707
It's all about what you can see Reinforcement, consequences, shaping behavior over time, abc, data, function of behavior.
00:03:59.707 --> 00:04:09.193
And if that feels a little bit clinical or mechanical, it makes sense because early behaviorism was built on studies with lab animals.
00:04:09.193 --> 00:04:18.567
That's where many of the foundational principles were first tested and a lot of behaviorism's foundational work.
00:04:18.567 --> 00:04:22.713
You probably remember learning about BF Skinner in grad school.
00:04:22.713 --> 00:04:29.745
His operant conditioning research all focused on stimulus response patterns in the lab.
00:04:29.745 --> 00:04:44.389
Reinforcement and punishment were used to either increase or decrease behaviors, and these behaviorists really didn't pay attention to the internal emotional or cognitive states that were driving the behaviors.
00:04:44.389 --> 00:05:28.495
So while behaviorism gave us some powerful tools for shaping behavior, it also left out an entire dimension, which is a human being's inner world, and there's value in that, especially when we're trying to create consistent plans that can be implemented by lots of people across a school campus and lots of different kinds of environments, the behaviorist approach can help us feel organized and efficient and confident that we're quote unquote doing something, and when we have students who benefit from structure and consistency, those behaviorist plans can absolutely help.
00:05:29.940 --> 00:05:36.173
But then there's trauma-informed practice, which focuses on an internal world.
00:05:36.173 --> 00:05:52.913
It asks things like what's happening inside the student, what's going on in their nervous system, how does their experience shape their behavior and what would it take to make them feel safe enough to show up differently?
00:05:52.913 --> 00:06:11.007
This lens is rooted in attachment theory, brain development research and polyvagal theory, and particularly focuses on the understanding that behavior often reflects a physiological state, not a conscious choice.
00:06:11.007 --> 00:06:26.771
According to Perry and Solovitz, 2017, children who have experienced trauma often react with survival-based behaviors, meaning those responses aren't premeditated or calculated.
00:06:26.771 --> 00:06:48.701
They're protective and we know that from a neurodevelopmental perspective, trauma can significantly disrupt a child's ability to self-regulate or to problem-solve, or even to connect socially, especially when that trauma exposure was early on in life or continues to be ongoing.
00:06:50.124 --> 00:07:01.810
As Dr Bruce Perry explained 2006, the lower brain takes over during distress and in those moments, logic and reasoning simply aren't accessible.
00:07:01.810 --> 00:07:08.687
You've probably talked with your students about this before, about flipping their lid with the hand model of the brain right.
00:07:08.687 --> 00:07:16.886
And when we look at behavior that way, it changes the conversation from won't to can't.
00:07:16.886 --> 00:07:19.790
At least they can't yet.
00:07:19.790 --> 00:07:22.935
So herein lies the tension.
00:07:22.935 --> 00:07:26.689
One approach behaviorism is external.
00:07:26.689 --> 00:07:29.348
It's focused on what we can see and what we can change.
00:07:29.348 --> 00:07:34.952
The other is internal and it's centered on what we feel and understand.
00:07:34.952 --> 00:07:43.454
So, if we're honest, these approaches do not always play nicely in the same room.
00:07:44.521 --> 00:07:57.889
You may have been in a trauma-informed training that told you never to ignore a child's dysregulation and then walked into a behavior team meeting where the goal was extinction through planned ignoring or withholding attention.
00:07:57.889 --> 00:08:15.504
Or you've likely heard someone say that a student is attention-seeking, with a tone that implies that they think the student is manipulating them, when your gut is telling you it's really about seeking connection, and here's where we get stuck.
00:08:15.504 --> 00:08:18.427
We are trained in empathy.
00:08:18.427 --> 00:08:36.234
We know behavior is communication, but we're also working in buildings that lean heavily on compliance-based systems, and so we're often asked to operate somewhere where we don't feel comfortable.
00:08:36.234 --> 00:08:41.326
We're expected to help students regulate without being too soft.
00:08:41.326 --> 00:08:48.142
We're expected to collaborate with behavior teams without pushing back on punitive practices.
00:08:48.142 --> 00:08:55.121
And we're expected to advocate for kids but not challenge the system that's failing some of them.
00:08:56.865 --> 00:08:57.986
It's a tall order.
00:08:57.986 --> 00:09:08.821
No wonder we feel so overwhelmed and tired, overwhelmed and tired.
00:09:08.821 --> 00:09:09.261
So what do we do?
00:09:09.261 --> 00:09:16.880
Do we just reject all these behavior plans in the name of compassion, or do we stick with these behavior plans and risk overlooking students' emotional needs?
00:09:16.880 --> 00:09:23.010
Fortunately, I think we can hold space in both sides.
00:09:23.010 --> 00:09:29.763
We can understand the function of behavior and consider the nervous system.
00:09:29.763 --> 00:09:40.206
At the same time, we can support positive behavior change while remaining careful that we're not pathologizing a student's response to stress.
00:09:40.206 --> 00:09:45.695
We can set boundaries, but also provide safety.
00:09:45.695 --> 00:09:49.708
Let's talk about some ways that might happen.
00:09:49.708 --> 00:09:55.971
Let's say we have a student that starts throwing chairs every time it's time to go to math.
00:09:56.980 --> 00:10:08.222
A traditional behaviorist might say the function of the behavior is escape, but a trauma-informed lens would say what is it about math that feels unsafe?
00:10:08.222 --> 00:10:10.687
Are they worried about failure?
00:10:10.687 --> 00:10:13.033
Do they feel a lack of control?
00:10:13.033 --> 00:10:15.163
Did someone once yell at them?
00:10:15.163 --> 00:10:17.631
Did someone once embarrass them in math?
00:10:17.631 --> 00:10:38.687
And if we can understand both sides, we can say yes, the behavior is about escape and we should be proactively co-regulating during transitions, or we can build in success moments or adjust our tone and body language whatever's needed, but we can do both.
00:10:40.211 --> 00:10:44.166
What about the student that just shouts out whatever's on their mind all day long?
00:10:44.166 --> 00:10:46.851
I bet you've had one of these before.
00:10:46.851 --> 00:10:48.125
I know I have many.
00:10:48.125 --> 00:10:52.070
The behaviorist view would say it's attention seeking.
00:10:52.070 --> 00:11:00.328
The trauma-informed view would say that may be rooted in some attachment trauma or maybe the fear of being unseen or forgotten.
00:11:00.328 --> 00:11:04.971
Can we teach the student to raise their hand through a behavior plan?
00:11:04.971 --> 00:11:07.620
Yes, gotten.
00:11:07.620 --> 00:11:09.304
Can we teach the student to raise their hand through a behavior plan?
00:11:09.304 --> 00:11:13.841
Yes, but we can also make sure that we're meeting that core need for connection in ways that reduce the need for disruption.
00:11:13.841 --> 00:11:27.318
This is how we can successfully work in an area where we're caught between the science that idolizes compliance.
00:11:29.121 --> 00:11:56.466
Sometimes you might feel like you're the only person that's advocating for a student's emotional needs, because this over-focus on compliance is also tied to a lot of school-wide pressures accountability, data, classroom management expectations and even evaluations management expectations and even evaluations.
00:11:56.466 --> 00:11:58.294
But behavior without buy-in isn't sustainable.
00:11:58.294 --> 00:12:06.825
Barth and Team 2004 noted that programs that ignore relational context often see short-term compliance at the expense of long-term emotional regulation and resilience.
00:12:06.825 --> 00:12:23.488
So, while you might worry that bringing up trauma will make you look like you're making excuses for students it's still important to be talking about, because we're not going to see the long-term effects of our interventions until we acknowledge that.
00:12:23.488 --> 00:12:40.381
So if you've been carrying some guilt or some resentment that you're not able to fully protect your students in these situations, or you feel absolutely exhausted from trying, my friend, I see you.
00:12:40.381 --> 00:12:48.586
You are not imagining that conflict and you are not wrong for wanting to do behavior intervention differently.
00:12:50.317 --> 00:12:54.200
The good news is this is where we shine as school counselors.
00:12:54.200 --> 00:13:03.764
We don't have to throw out the data-driven plans or abandon accountability, but we can bring a human lens to this work.
00:13:03.764 --> 00:13:11.166
We can show up and ask questions like what's driving this Before we jump into how do we stop it?
00:13:11.166 --> 00:13:21.876
We can advocate for co-regulation or sensory tools or adult modeling, while still setting clear behavioral goals.
00:13:21.876 --> 00:13:32.951
And really most importantly, we can help our teams on campus stay focused on the why of the plan and not just the what.
00:13:33.875 --> 00:13:48.318
But how do we take this understanding that behavior is both observable and emotional and turn it into something that we can use on a school campus without being the lone voice shouting into the wilderness?
00:13:48.318 --> 00:13:49.282
There's a better way.
00:13:49.282 --> 00:13:50.163
There's a better way.
00:13:50.163 --> 00:14:00.620
We need some frameworks at our back to help promote buy-in and authority right.
00:14:00.620 --> 00:14:02.605
So there are a couple frameworks that would be great options.
00:14:02.605 --> 00:14:07.323
The first is my favorite Ross Green's Collaborative and Proactive Solutions Model.
00:14:07.323 --> 00:14:23.124
It used to be called the collaborative problem-solving model up until fairly recently, but Ross Green's model invites us to shift from how do we get compliance to what lagging skills or unsolved problems are getting in the way.
00:14:23.124 --> 00:14:37.866
So instead of focusing on reward or consequence, it centers on working with students to solve the problems collaboratively, so that we're offering structure but also compassion.
00:14:37.866 --> 00:15:04.416
Research by Green, ablon and Goring in 2003 has shown that this CPS model brings significant reductions in oppositional behavior and disciplinary removals, especially in students with behavioral challenges who struggle with flexibility, frustration, tolerance or executive functioning skills, and it has been used and widely proven in trauma-sensitive schools.
00:15:06.118 --> 00:15:37.008
You could also use a trauma-informed adaptation of positive behavior, interventions and supports, or what we always call PBIS informed principles into it, like emotional safety, predictability, staff regulation and strong adult-student relationships in Tier 1 and Tier 2 supports.
00:15:37.008 --> 00:15:46.297
So this creates a PBIS model that supports structure, but it doesn't sacrifice understanding and care.
00:15:46.297 --> 00:15:54.419
And then there's the ARC framework, which stands for Attachment, regulation, competency.
00:15:54.419 --> 00:16:09.616
It's a trauma-focused model that emphasizes building foundational relational safety, which supports emotional regulation and developmentally appropriate skill building.
00:16:09.616 --> 00:16:36.688
This approach, the ARC framework, has been recognized as an evidence-based practice by the California Evidence-Based Clearinghouse for Child Welfare, and research by Blaustein and Kinneberg 2010 shows that the ARC framework helps students improve regulation, reduce disruptive behavior and build more consistent relationships with caregivers and educators.
00:16:37.991 --> 00:16:49.100
Really, the whole core idea of an ARC framework is that students can't show up well until their nervous systems and relationships are strong enough to hold change.
00:16:49.100 --> 00:17:05.700
So each of these frameworks collaborative and proactive solutions, a trauma-informed PBIS and the ARC framework show us that we don't have to choose between structure or emotional safety.
00:17:05.700 --> 00:17:12.529
We can ethically do both with intention and with the student at the center of the process.
00:17:12.529 --> 00:17:29.828
So these models do give us a path forward, but let's be real, they do not solve everything, because underneath all of this theory and frameworks, there's something deeper at play.
00:17:29.828 --> 00:17:34.777
There's theory and frameworks.
00:17:34.777 --> 00:17:43.057
There's something deeper at play, and that's our role on our campus as school counselors, because the reality is we're not just stuck between behaviorism and trauma-informed care by accident.
00:17:43.057 --> 00:17:51.329
We are expected to operate in both worlds, even when one of those worlds really wasn't designed for us.
00:17:52.775 --> 00:17:57.186
The behavior systems in schools were not created with school counselors in mind.
00:17:57.186 --> 00:18:06.939
They were built to maintain structure in classroom management and to apply interventions driven by external compliance.
00:18:06.939 --> 00:18:14.496
But that's not how our brains think and that's not where our skill set shines.
00:18:14.496 --> 00:18:20.549
We're trained in human development, attachment, emotional safety.
00:18:20.549 --> 00:18:23.376
We're not behavior technicians.
00:18:23.376 --> 00:18:35.204
We're mental health professionals, and while we can absolutely contribute to the process of behavior planning, that does not mean that we should be the ones leading it.
00:18:35.204 --> 00:19:00.339
In fact, despite my best efforts over the last couple of episodes to guide you, if you have been tagged as the point person for behavior on your campus, we cannot ignore the fact that trying to own both the data collection and the emotional regulation of behavior intervention just burns us out and really kind of makes us feel like it waters down what we're best at.
00:19:01.823 --> 00:19:04.147
There's actually research to back this up.
00:19:04.147 --> 00:19:20.790
Berger and team 2019 found that educators, especially school mental health staff, often experience ethical dissonance when trying to implement behavioral strategies that feel misaligned with trauma-informed values.
00:19:20.790 --> 00:19:38.395
Team emphasized that counselors are uniquely positioned to help schools adopt trauma-sensitive practices, which means we should not be absorbing the full weight of traditional behavior management systems.
00:19:38.395 --> 00:19:44.547
So, yes, we can build bridges between behaviorism and trauma-informed care.
00:19:44.547 --> 00:19:57.154
We can help teams understand the why behind the student behavior, but we should not be the keepers of every chart and every consequence plan and every compliance strategy.
00:19:57.154 --> 00:20:06.240
That is letting students down because we are not honoring our lane and the value that we bring to our work.
00:20:08.096 --> 00:20:09.941
So maybe you're listening and you're thinking.
00:20:09.941 --> 00:20:18.885
You know, steph, that sounds great and really idealistic, but reality is I am the behavior person on campus.
00:20:18.885 --> 00:20:22.718
I didn't ask to be, I don't want to be, but I don't have a choice.
00:20:22.718 --> 00:20:25.625
So I want you to know if that is you.
00:20:25.625 --> 00:20:27.328
Yeah, it's frustrating.
00:20:27.328 --> 00:20:28.556
I've been there.
00:20:28.556 --> 00:20:29.757
I know what that feels like.
00:20:29.757 --> 00:20:32.439
But the good news is you may not be stuck.
00:20:33.921 --> 00:20:40.967
Getting out of that kind of a role is not going to happen with one meeting or one magic sentence, despite what the internet is going to tell you.
00:20:40.967 --> 00:20:53.462
It's going to be a slow shift and it's going to be one that has to happen through the way you show up and how you reframe behavior work on your campus, little by little.
00:20:53.462 --> 00:21:03.631
If you want to shift out of this role, you're going to have to be committed to the long game, because it's going to be incremental, but it can be done.
00:21:03.631 --> 00:21:07.048
Here's what that could look like.
00:21:07.048 --> 00:21:10.909
First, you could start reframing requests.
00:21:12.082 --> 00:21:18.490
When somebody brings you a behavior concern, you don't just automatically jump into problem-solving or plan-writing mode.
00:21:18.490 --> 00:21:22.626
Start by offering something that's actually in your lane.
00:21:22.626 --> 00:21:25.921
Let's look at what's driving this behavior.
00:21:25.921 --> 00:21:32.013
Let's work together and see if we can understand what the student is missing emotionally.
00:21:32.013 --> 00:21:44.171
So you're still showing up, you're still being helpful, but you're shifting the conversation from compliance to connection and you're laying the groundwork for a different kind of support.
00:21:44.171 --> 00:22:05.800
I think so often on campuses we instinctively just jump to the problem-solving mode right, because that's what everyone expects and we're very uncomfortable with the idea of people thinking that we don't know what we're doing, and so we often jump to things that are observable and measurable, ie behavior plans and interventions.
00:22:05.800 --> 00:22:20.061
But if you can really sit in and be okay with the fact that the rate of change through counseling interventions is often different than these compliance-based mechanisms, you're going to be okay.
00:22:22.646 --> 00:22:25.653
Secondly, you could clarify your contributions.
00:22:25.653 --> 00:22:40.162
So if you want to get out of the behavior side of things, instead of saying that's not my job, which never ends well, right, you could say something like I may not be the best person to lead this intervention process.
00:22:40.162 --> 00:22:48.726
I can help with understanding behavior and I can provide counseling supports, but somebody else might need to manage the day-to-day plan.
00:22:48.726 --> 00:22:54.241
So that keeps you in the conversation while naming a boundary.
00:22:54.241 --> 00:22:56.365
Is it always going to work?
00:22:56.365 --> 00:23:06.843
No, like I said, this is going to be an incremental process, but if you can kind of start scattering these initiatives here and there, you're going to start to see the needle move.
00:23:06.843 --> 00:23:15.023
Third, and something we talk about often use your use of time data to redirect expectations.
00:23:15.023 --> 00:23:24.269
Keep the information about how many hours you've been involved in behavior programming throughout your week versus other initiatives.
00:23:24.269 --> 00:23:45.903
This is also going to involve a strong foundation of know, like and trust with your school administrator, and I wouldn't recommend jumping into this one right off the bat, but we have several members of our mastermind who have had great success with showing use of time data once they got to the right threshold with their administrator.
00:23:47.729 --> 00:23:56.449
And last, a powerful approach that a lot of people don't really talk about is that teaching your campus to self-manage.
00:23:56.449 --> 00:24:11.163
Behavior teams often default to you because they don't know what else to do, so you can shift that by giving short specific tools that are aligned with the issue and with your training.
00:24:11.163 --> 00:24:17.134
You could give teachers a simple bank of regulation strategies to train the classroom.
00:24:17.134 --> 00:24:20.300
You could give them a co-regulation list.
00:24:20.300 --> 00:24:30.265
You could give them a brief summary that highlights not just what the student's doing in the classroom but why they might be doing it.
00:24:30.265 --> 00:24:37.404
Provide an explanation so that your school staff learns to lean on you strategically and not reflexively.
00:24:39.406 --> 00:24:59.894
One amazing thing that we've done on our campus and I cannot take credit for this it was not my idea, but I sure wish it had been we have a cabinet in our teacher workroom full of behavior strategies, charts and things to try as Tier 1 and early Tier 2 interventions.
00:24:59.894 --> 00:25:09.611
We have trained our staff that before anyone else needs to jump in to help them, they need to try to help themselves, and that can be very powerful when it just becomes a way of doing business on your campus.
00:25:09.611 --> 00:25:19.567
When folks request support and you're able to say what Tier 1 interventions have you tried on your own here, come, try some of these listed in here, it becomes a big deal.
00:25:19.567 --> 00:25:39.509
The beauty of these approaches, of reframing the requests, clarifying your contributions, using use of time data and teaching folks instead of just bringing the heap none of those require some big, bold declaration.
00:25:39.509 --> 00:25:43.325
I hereby am no longer involved in behavior intervention plans.
00:25:43.325 --> 00:25:49.403
As much as we would like to provide those, it's just not realistic or safe.
00:25:49.403 --> 00:26:01.884
But they can, with consistency, give you the ability to step back into what your real role should be at school, and that's empowering y'all.
00:26:01.884 --> 00:26:11.750
That feels so good when we start to veer back into our lane and we start to get more opportunities to do what we do best.
00:26:12.554 --> 00:26:15.542
All right, this episode has gone on a while, so I'm going to leave you with this.
00:26:15.542 --> 00:26:28.060
I want you to remember behavior change in students is possible, but compassion is also necessary and you do not have to choose between the two.
00:26:28.060 --> 00:26:31.644
So stop and think for just a minute.
00:26:31.644 --> 00:26:36.392
What's one thing that you might do differently this week?
00:26:36.392 --> 00:26:49.846
Not trying to fix everything, not trying to make a huge change, but what one thing can you do to try to bring your work closer to your lane and your values?
00:26:49.846 --> 00:26:55.451
Is it advising behavior teams on emotional responses?
00:26:55.451 --> 00:27:03.020
Is it collaborating more often with behavior plans instead of being the lone ranger?
00:27:03.020 --> 00:27:13.804
Or is it looking at some of these frameworks like CPS or ARC and advocating for implementing them on your campus in the coming years?
00:27:13.804 --> 00:27:23.404
Or is it one of these four most recent strategies I outlined for empowering your own school staff to jump into the mix.
00:27:23.404 --> 00:27:35.423
So it's not always you, whatever it is, whatever step you identify, however small it may feel, it's going to be a step in the right direction and I believe in you.
00:27:35.423 --> 00:27:36.929
I believe you can do this.
00:27:36.929 --> 00:27:47.054
I believe you can make these changes on your campus and start walking toward a more fulfilling role at your school as the school counselor.
00:27:48.642 --> 00:28:03.236
Hey, if this episode spoke to your heart, make sure that you check out our School for School Counselors Mastermind, where we have conversations about these kinds of things each and every week, and we also have the Behavior Intervention Playbook.
00:28:03.236 --> 00:28:16.069
It's designed for school counselors that are navigating exactly these kinds of conversations in a checklist form, one step right after the other, so you never have to feel lost or flustered.
00:28:16.069 --> 00:28:19.519
So you never have to feel lost or flustered.
00:28:19.519 --> 00:28:29.667
We have all kinds of tools like this in our mastermind that are practical and designed to help you move forward with clarity, with confidence and with heart, and I would love for you to check that out.
00:28:29.667 --> 00:28:32.509
You can find out more at schoolforschoolcounselorscom.
00:28:32.509 --> 00:28:34.788
Slash mastermind.
00:28:34.788 --> 00:28:37.224
All right, my friend.
00:28:37.224 --> 00:28:38.228
That's all for now.
00:28:38.228 --> 00:28:42.692
I'll be back soon with another episode of the School for School Counselors podcast.
00:28:42.692 --> 00:28:47.313
In the meantime, I hope you have the best week, take care.