Aug. 11, 2025
GRADED: Check In, Check Out
What if the behavior approach everyone swears by is actually making some kids worse? Check-In/Check-Out (CICO) is one of the most common Tier 2 interventions in school counseling, but most trainings leave out the detail that decides whether it works or fails. In this episode, I share the research, the hidden limitation no one’s talking about, and the story of a student who proved that “research-based” doesn’t always mean “right for every kid.” This episode is highly researched: Fairba...
What if the behavior approach everyone swears by is actually making some kids worse?
Check-In/Check-Out (CICO) is one of the most common Tier 2 interventions in school counseling, but most trainings leave out the detail that decides whether it works or fails.
In this episode, I share the research, the hidden limitation no one’s talking about, and the story of a student who proved that “research-based” doesn’t always mean “right for every kid.”
This episode is highly researched:
Fairbanks, S., Sugai, G., Guardino, D., & Lathrop, M. (2007). Response to intervention: Examining classroom behavior support in second grade. Exceptional Children, 73(3), 288–310.
Filter, K. J., McKenna, M. K., Benedict, E. A., Horner, R. H., Todd, A. W., & Watson, J. (2007). Check in/check out: A post-hoc evaluation of an efficient, secondary-level targeted intervention for reducing problem behaviors in schools. Education and Treatment of Children, 30(1), 69–84.
Hawken, L. S., Bundock, K., Barrett, C. A., Eber, L., Breen, K., & Phillips, D. (2015). Large-scale implementation of check-in check-out: A descriptive study. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 30(4), 304–319.
Hawken, L. S., MacLeod, K. S., & Rawlings, L. (2007). Effects of the Behavior Education Program (BEP) on office discipline referrals of elementary school students. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 9(2), 94–101.
Klingbeil, D. A., Dart, E. H., & Schramm, S. A. (2019). A systematic review of function‐based modifications to check‐in/check‐out. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 21(1), 3–18.
Maggin, D. M., Zurheide, J., Pickett, K. C., & Baillie, S. (2015). A systematic evidence review of the check‐in/check‐out program for reducing student challenging behaviors. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 17(4), 197–208.
Sottilare, A. L., & Blair, K.-S. C. (2023). Implementation of check-in/check-out to improve classroom behavior of at-risk elementary school students. Behavioral Sciences, 13(3), 257.
Note: "Jake" and "Carrie" are fictional versions of students based on compilations of real stories.
*********************************
⭐️ Want support with real-world strategies that actually work on your campus? We’re doing that every day in the School for School Counselors Mastermind. Come join us! ⭐️
**********************************
Tired of feeling overworked, underestimated, and buried under responsibilities no one trained you for?
The School for School Counselors Podcast is for real-world counselors who want clarity, confidence, and tools that actually work in real schools... not packaged curriculums or toxic positivity.
You’ll get honest conversations, practical strategies, and a real-world alternative to the one-size-fits-all approach you’ve probably been told to follow.
If the ASCA-aligned model doesn’t fit your campus, it's not your fault.
This podcast is where you’ll finally hear why, and what to do instead.
You don’t need more PD. You need someone who actually gets it.
00:00 - Jake's Story: When Interventions Fail
03:28 - The Research Behind Check-In Check-Out
06:18 - Understanding Function vs. Form
08:45 - Four Steps to Effective Interventions
12:27 - When SECO Works and When It Doesn't
15:09 - Final Thoughts: Beyond Popular Interventions
WEBVTT
00:00:00.160 --> 00:00:09.862
I have to tell you about Jake, a fourth grader with this very messy, spiky looking haircut that never seemed to move.
00:00:09.862 --> 00:00:19.893
He would shuffle into school about five or ten minutes late because inevitably he'd gotten sidetracked on the way to school or on his way down the hallway.
00:00:19.893 --> 00:00:35.012
But he had a smile that would light up the cafeteria, the classroom or the office where Jake was always felt too small when he was in it, because he had this energy that just filled every single corner.
00:00:35.012 --> 00:00:45.808
He had the kind of personality that made teachers smile until he saw a classmate's new sneakers or their new backpack and just had to touch them.
00:00:45.808 --> 00:00:50.164
Or he heard a fire truck and shouted my dad's a firefighter.
00:00:50.164 --> 00:00:51.609
In the middle of a spelling test.
00:00:51.609 --> 00:00:57.912
His brain and his body were just always three steps ahead of his self-control.
00:00:57.912 --> 00:01:01.649
Have you ever had a student like Jake?
00:01:03.100 --> 00:01:09.682
I did what any by-the-book school counselor would do I put him on check-in, check-out, seco.
00:01:09.682 --> 00:01:15.212
I followed every step exactly, built the morning relationship.
00:01:15.212 --> 00:01:18.743
I had a cool folder with a point sheet inside.
00:01:18.743 --> 00:01:25.915
We collected perfect data and I really thought that I was the poster child for evidence-based practice.
00:01:25.915 --> 00:01:39.701
Every morning Jake would bounce out to greet me in the hallway with that spiky hair and we would set goals for the day, and I sent him off thinking that we were building something amazing and meaningful.
00:01:39.701 --> 00:01:44.465
But after we'd done this for a few weeks, I pulled the data.
00:01:44.465 --> 00:01:45.768
But after we'd done this for a few weeks, I pulled the data.
00:01:45.768 --> 00:01:50.611
I started looking at the data trends and I froze.
00:01:50.611 --> 00:01:55.537
I had the sickest feeling in my stomach.
00:01:55.537 --> 00:02:04.989
I can still remember it, because I started to realize that I had been completely wrong.
00:02:04.989 --> 00:02:17.021
Jake had more behavioral incidents on the days that we checked in than the days that we didn't, and his best days had been the mornings when a crisis kept me from seeing him at all.
00:02:17.021 --> 00:02:29.003
And I started to wonder what if the most celebrated and recommended tier two behavior intervention in schools was actually making some kids worse.
00:02:29.003 --> 00:02:35.175
Hey, school counselor, welcome back In this episode of our graded series.
00:02:35.175 --> 00:02:41.002
We're digging into one of the most widely recommended tier two behavior interventions in schools.
00:02:41.002 --> 00:02:42.764
Check in, check out.
00:02:42.764 --> 00:02:48.282
It's supposed to build connection, improve behavior and give us usable data.
00:02:48.282 --> 00:02:54.480
But does it actually help or can it backfire for some students and make the problem worse?
00:02:54.480 --> 00:03:04.306
I'll share what research really says, the critical detail most trainings leave out, and how to decide when Seco is the right move and when it's not.
00:03:04.306 --> 00:03:13.170
So if you're ready for some straight talk, my friend, some clarity on your work and a little bit of rebellion, you're going to be in the right place.
00:03:13.170 --> 00:03:18.372
I'm Steph Johnson, and this is the School for School Counselors podcast.
00:03:19.300 --> 00:03:40.328
My confusing data sent me on some late night research binges and you can imagine me sitting up at 11 o'clock with my laptop reading every check-in check-out study I could find and trying to understand how I could follow all the steps perfectly and it still end up so wrong.
00:03:40.328 --> 00:03:43.311
Here's what finally stood out.
00:03:43.311 --> 00:03:47.316
There were plenty of positives about this approach.
00:03:47.316 --> 00:03:58.304
Multiple studies by researchers like Hawken and colleagues show that check-in checkout can cut office referrals, improve behavior and boost engagement.
00:03:58.304 --> 00:04:18.514
Teachers generally love it and in that massive study of over 441 schools, over 70% hit fidelity benchmarks, supporting about 10% of their students, and 80% of those students met their daily point goals.
00:04:18.514 --> 00:04:39.834
But there is a huge asterisk here because even in that success story, 25 to 40 percent of students still needed more support and in one RTI study by Fairbanks with second graders, only about half improved on check-in checkout.
00:04:39.834 --> 00:04:43.189
The rest needed something entirely different.
00:04:43.189 --> 00:04:45.976
The rest needed something entirely different.
00:04:53.923 --> 00:04:57.300
When you look at the research, you find a pattern that's buried in the systematic reviews that nobody ever talks about.
00:04:57.300 --> 00:05:05.454
Check-in check-out works best for students whose misbehavior is driven by adult attention.
00:05:05.454 --> 00:05:15.233
And when you think about it, it makes sense, because the design of check-in check-out is exactly that Daily check-ins, feedback and relationships are all at the core of the approach.
00:05:15.233 --> 00:05:32.697
So for attention seekers, this is like magic, but for other situations, like students trying to escape maybe the presence of skill deficits or sensory needs like Jake's, the impact of SECO drops significantly.
00:05:32.697 --> 00:05:38.050
One 2015 review by Magan even called the evidence.
00:05:38.050 --> 00:05:38.771
Mixed.
00:05:38.771 --> 00:05:55.343
Single case studies looked great, but group studies showed no significant effects and the researchers themselves acknowledged that students with more severe or functionally different problems often need additional support.
00:05:56.845 --> 00:06:08.783
When I learned all that, jake's puzzling data wasn't surprising at all, because being research-based isn't the same as being student-matched.
00:06:08.783 --> 00:06:21.237
When we look at the research, there is one truth that is unavoidable the why behind the behavior matters more than the what.
00:06:21.237 --> 00:06:36.627
On my campus, jake wasn't acting out to get attention and the signs of ADHD were pretty compelling His blurts about pizza fractions and his fidgeting and his I just have to touch everything moments.
00:06:36.627 --> 00:06:39.172
Those were executive function struggles.
00:06:39.172 --> 00:06:42.059
They were not a bid for connection.
00:06:42.059 --> 00:06:55.274
Jake's brain was like a browser with 47 tabs open and our check-ins were just adding one more tab to his already overwhelmed system.
00:06:55.274 --> 00:06:59.411
Check-in checkout doesn't teach executive skills.
00:06:59.411 --> 00:07:06.415
It measures and it rewards behavior, but if the skill isn't there yet, you're just tracking the struggle.
00:07:06.415 --> 00:07:11.377
We cannot behavior manage our way out of a brain-based difference.
00:07:11.377 --> 00:07:18.468
So when I finally understood what Jake actually needed, things started to change.
00:07:18.468 --> 00:07:33.615
Instead of giving morning check-ins that added to his cognitive load, we created a break card for him to use, and instead of behavior points that focused on what he couldn't do, we practiced appropriate ways to fidget.
00:07:33.615 --> 00:07:46.050
We taught him the pause and breathe strategy and within two weeks his blurts dropped significantly because we were finally addressing what his brain actually needed.
00:07:46.050 --> 00:07:59.766
So here's the approach that I use now, and I think it's one that would have saved Jake and myself months of frustration, if I'm being honest.
00:07:59.766 --> 00:08:00.547
But we live and learn right.
00:08:00.547 --> 00:08:02.490
We live and learn and we're always seeking to get better.
00:08:02.569 --> 00:08:05.214
First, identify the function.
00:08:05.214 --> 00:08:08.100
Use quick ABC data.
00:08:08.100 --> 00:08:09.987
Do you remember learning that in grad school?
00:08:09.987 --> 00:08:17.038
Antecedent behavior consequence what happens before, during and after the behavior?
00:08:17.038 --> 00:08:20.050
What's the student getting or avoiding?
00:08:20.050 --> 00:08:27.810
For Jake, the pattern was clear when we looked for it Impulsive responses in stimulating environments.
00:08:27.810 --> 00:08:33.149
Those all pointed to executive function challenges, not attention seeking.
00:08:34.893 --> 00:08:36.898
Secondly, match the intervention.
00:08:36.898 --> 00:08:49.296
If it's attention seeking behavior, check-in check-out can shine because the daily connection and feedback is exactly what those students' nervous systems are craving.
00:08:49.296 --> 00:08:57.438
But if they're escape motivated, if they have skill deficits or sensory needs like Jake's, choose something else.
00:08:57.438 --> 00:09:00.854
Don't just ask if the intervention works.
00:09:00.854 --> 00:09:08.359
Ask if it works for this student with this need in this moment.
00:09:08.359 --> 00:09:12.274
Third, parent with skill building.
00:09:12.274 --> 00:09:23.956
If check-in check-out is the right fit, use those check-ins to teach actual skills, teach self-regulation, communication transitions.
00:09:23.956 --> 00:09:30.778
The relationship in this is the vehicle, but skill building should be the destination.
00:09:30.778 --> 00:09:41.285
And fourth, plan the fade, the destination.
00:09:41.285 --> 00:09:42.147
And fourth, plan the fade From day one.
00:09:42.147 --> 00:09:44.711
Build towards self-monitoring so students can graduate out of check-in checkout.
00:09:44.731 --> 00:09:56.759
Research shows some students can maintain gains when we gradually reduce adult feedback and we know that success is not measured by staying on check-in checkout.
00:09:56.759 --> 00:09:59.389
Success is not needing it anymore.
00:09:59.389 --> 00:10:15.696
So identifying the function, matching the intervention to the student and the concern, pairing it with skill building and planning the fade are essentials in effectively addressing student concerns.
00:10:15.696 --> 00:10:27.048
And I will tell you, I know that sounds really straightforward, but I also know when you go to apply this in the messy reality of what you do every single day.
00:10:27.048 --> 00:10:29.352
It feels complicated, doesn't it?
00:10:29.352 --> 00:10:42.559
That's where having a community of colleagues makes all the difference, and it's why I created the School for School Counselors Mastermind, so we can work through these types of real-world challenges together.
00:10:42.559 --> 00:10:53.538
But let me tell you what it looks like when check-in checkout actually works, because, to be fair, I've also seen it work beautifully.
00:10:53.538 --> 00:11:11.270
I've also seen it work beautifully, like with Carrie, a fifth grader who lit up every time an adult noticed her effort For her, that daily feedback loop turned her behavior around in just a few weeks and by springtime she didn't even need check-ins anymore.
00:11:11.270 --> 00:11:17.941
That's Seco working exactly as designed for exactly the right function.
00:11:17.941 --> 00:11:27.131
But I've also seen students like Jake cycle through Seco for months and months and months and never really show any real progress.
00:11:27.131 --> 00:11:34.250
They get labeled as non-responders or defiant, when really they need a different tool.
00:11:34.250 --> 00:11:45.176
And if you really want to get into the nitty gritty with this, I'll tell you what keeps me up at night when I think about check-in check-out and yes, I do stay up at night thinking about this stuff.
00:11:46.504 --> 00:11:51.893
Most of the research available only tracks behavior during implementation.
00:11:51.893 --> 00:12:00.630
There is little to no comprehensive data on what happens weeks or even months after check-in checkout ends.
00:12:00.630 --> 00:12:09.775
There's this huge gap where we're implementing interventions but we don't really know or understand their long-term impacts.
00:12:09.775 --> 00:12:18.538
You know, my situation with Jake taught me three truths that I now carry into every behavior plan.
00:12:18.538 --> 00:12:25.899
One perfect implementation of the wrong intervention is still the wrong intervention.
00:12:25.899 --> 00:12:31.398
Secondly, compliance isn't the same as capacity.
00:12:31.398 --> 00:12:37.052
And third, every behavior makes sense to the person that's doing it.
00:12:37.052 --> 00:12:42.471
Our job is to understand their logic, not impose our own.
00:12:42.471 --> 00:12:47.471
This is how I now evaluate every behavior support decision.
00:12:47.471 --> 00:12:57.442
So I know that my suggestions are being backed by research and honors the critical importance of function matching honors the critical importance of function matching.
00:12:57.461 --> 00:13:05.509
So before you put a student on check-in checkout, you need to ask what's this behavior actually accomplishing for them?
00:13:05.509 --> 00:13:14.777
If the answer is not gaining adult attention, you might be about to give them the wrong tool, even if it's for the right reasons.
00:13:14.777 --> 00:13:28.283
How many students on your check-in checkout list right now might be like my, jake, where they're getting perfectly implemented support but it doesn't match what they actually need?
00:13:28.283 --> 00:13:31.629
So you know this series is graded.
00:13:31.629 --> 00:13:35.083
We're going to grade all of our approaches in school counseling.
00:13:35.083 --> 00:13:39.361
What grade do you think I'm going to give check-in check-out?
00:13:39.361 --> 00:13:44.130
Well, if you guessed a B you would be right.
00:13:44.130 --> 00:13:46.274
It's oddly specific.
00:13:47.980 --> 00:13:57.707
Check-in check-out is effective when it's matched to the right function, when it's done with fidelity and when it's paired with skill building.
00:13:57.707 --> 00:14:08.304
But all too often very little of that is happening and instead it's used as a catch-all, which sets a lot of kids up to fail Like.
00:14:08.304 --> 00:14:26.985
I hope I don't sound too harsh here, but even the systematic reviews are acknowledging the limitations of this approach, and that mixed support finding that I mentioned earlier and the research that shows significant non-response rates validates what we are seeing on our campuses.
00:14:26.985 --> 00:14:33.484
We cannot throw small groups or check-in check-out at every student who needs Tier 2 intervention.
00:14:33.484 --> 00:14:36.792
Neither one is always appropriate.
00:14:36.792 --> 00:14:57.972
Jake taught me that good intentions and perfect implementation aren't enough if we're trying to solve the wrong problem, and the difference between being intervention focused and being student focused is not just asking if your tool works, but if it works for this specific kid.
00:14:59.860 --> 00:15:14.749
If you want to dig deeper into research-driven behavior supports that actually work, not only for your campus culture and student needs but for your own personal bandwidth, you need to come join us in the School for School Counselors Mastermind.
00:15:14.749 --> 00:15:26.822
We dig into real situations every single week through the kind of nuanced thinking that helps every student get what they actually need.
00:15:26.822 --> 00:15:31.541
If you're interested in checking out the Mastermind, you can find the link in the show notes.
00:15:31.541 --> 00:15:33.787
We would love to have you come join us.
00:15:33.787 --> 00:15:39.682
All right, I'll be back soon with another episode of the School for School Counselors podcast.
00:15:39.682 --> 00:15:47.043
In the meantime, just remember every student deserves the right tool, not just the popular ones.
00:15:47.043 --> 00:15:51.211
And in case you're wondering, jake is doing great now.
00:15:51.211 --> 00:15:55.466
I saw him just the other day and he still has that spiky little haircut.
00:15:55.466 --> 00:16:00.563
But now he's got the tools that work with his brain and not against it.
00:16:00.563 --> 00:16:06.847
My friends, he is thriving and with the right interventions, your students can do the same.
00:16:06.847 --> 00:16:07.993
Take care.
00:00:00.160 --> 00:00:09.862
00:00:09.862 --> 00:00:19.893
00:00:19.893 --> 00:00:35.012
00:00:35.012 --> 00:00:45.808
00:00:45.808 --> 00:00:50.164
00:00:50.164 --> 00:00:51.609
00:00:51.609 --> 00:00:57.912
00:00:57.912 --> 00:01:01.649
00:01:03.100 --> 00:01:09.682
00:01:09.682 --> 00:01:15.212
00:01:15.212 --> 00:01:18.743
00:01:18.743 --> 00:01:25.915
00:01:25.915 --> 00:01:39.701
00:01:39.701 --> 00:01:44.465
00:01:44.465 --> 00:01:45.768
00:01:45.768 --> 00:01:50.611
00:01:50.611 --> 00:01:55.537
00:01:55.537 --> 00:02:04.989
00:02:04.989 --> 00:02:17.021
00:02:17.021 --> 00:02:29.003
00:02:29.003 --> 00:02:35.175
00:02:35.175 --> 00:02:41.002
00:02:41.002 --> 00:02:42.764
00:02:42.764 --> 00:02:48.282
00:02:48.282 --> 00:02:54.480
00:02:54.480 --> 00:03:04.306
00:03:04.306 --> 00:03:13.170
00:03:13.170 --> 00:03:18.372
00:03:19.300 --> 00:03:40.328
00:03:40.328 --> 00:03:43.311
00:03:43.311 --> 00:03:47.316
00:03:47.316 --> 00:03:58.304
00:03:58.304 --> 00:04:18.514
00:04:18.514 --> 00:04:39.834
00:04:39.834 --> 00:04:43.189
00:04:43.189 --> 00:04:45.976
00:04:53.923 --> 00:04:57.300
00:04:57.300 --> 00:05:05.454
00:05:05.454 --> 00:05:15.233
00:05:15.233 --> 00:05:32.697
00:05:32.697 --> 00:05:38.050
00:05:38.050 --> 00:05:38.771
00:05:38.771 --> 00:05:55.343
00:05:56.845 --> 00:06:08.783
00:06:08.783 --> 00:06:21.237
00:06:21.237 --> 00:06:36.627
00:06:36.627 --> 00:06:39.172
00:06:39.172 --> 00:06:42.059
00:06:42.059 --> 00:06:55.274
00:06:55.274 --> 00:06:59.411
00:06:59.411 --> 00:07:06.415
00:07:06.415 --> 00:07:11.377
00:07:11.377 --> 00:07:18.468
00:07:18.468 --> 00:07:33.615
00:07:33.615 --> 00:07:46.050
00:07:46.050 --> 00:07:59.766
00:07:59.766 --> 00:08:00.547
00:08:00.547 --> 00:08:02.490
00:08:02.569 --> 00:08:05.214
00:08:05.214 --> 00:08:08.100
00:08:08.100 --> 00:08:09.987
00:08:09.987 --> 00:08:17.038
00:08:17.038 --> 00:08:20.050
00:08:20.050 --> 00:08:27.810
00:08:27.810 --> 00:08:33.149
00:08:34.893 --> 00:08:36.898
00:08:36.898 --> 00:08:49.296
00:08:49.296 --> 00:08:57.438
00:08:57.438 --> 00:09:00.854
00:09:00.854 --> 00:09:08.359
00:09:08.359 --> 00:09:12.274
00:09:12.274 --> 00:09:23.956
00:09:23.956 --> 00:09:30.778
00:09:30.778 --> 00:09:41.285
00:09:41.285 --> 00:09:42.147
00:09:42.147 --> 00:09:44.711
00:09:44.731 --> 00:09:56.759
00:09:56.759 --> 00:09:59.389
00:09:59.389 --> 00:10:15.696
00:10:15.696 --> 00:10:27.048
00:10:27.048 --> 00:10:29.352
00:10:29.352 --> 00:10:42.559
00:10:42.559 --> 00:10:53.538
00:10:53.538 --> 00:11:11.270
00:11:11.270 --> 00:11:17.941
00:11:17.941 --> 00:11:27.131
00:11:27.131 --> 00:11:34.250
00:11:34.250 --> 00:11:45.176
00:11:46.504 --> 00:11:51.893
00:11:51.893 --> 00:12:00.630
00:12:00.630 --> 00:12:09.775
00:12:09.775 --> 00:12:18.538
00:12:18.538 --> 00:12:25.899
00:12:25.899 --> 00:12:31.398
00:12:31.398 --> 00:12:37.052
00:12:37.052 --> 00:12:42.471
00:12:42.471 --> 00:12:47.471
00:12:47.471 --> 00:12:57.442
00:12:57.461 --> 00:13:05.509
00:13:05.509 --> 00:13:14.777
00:13:14.777 --> 00:13:28.283
00:13:28.283 --> 00:13:31.629
00:13:31.629 --> 00:13:35.083
00:13:35.083 --> 00:13:39.361
00:13:39.361 --> 00:13:44.130
00:13:44.130 --> 00:13:46.274
00:13:47.980 --> 00:13:57.707
00:13:57.707 --> 00:14:08.304
00:14:08.304 --> 00:14:26.985
00:14:26.985 --> 00:14:33.484
00:14:33.484 --> 00:14:36.792
00:14:36.792 --> 00:14:57.972
00:14:59.860 --> 00:15:14.749
00:15:14.749 --> 00:15:26.822
00:15:26.822 --> 00:15:31.541
00:15:31.541 --> 00:15:33.787
00:15:33.787 --> 00:15:39.682
00:15:39.682 --> 00:15:47.043
00:15:47.043 --> 00:15:51.211
00:15:51.211 --> 00:15:55.466
00:15:55.466 --> 00:16:00.563
00:16:00.563 --> 00:16:06.847
00:16:06.847 --> 00:16:07.993